With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Seyfarth Synopsis: On August 5, 2017, the Final Rules and Regulations for the New York City Fair Chance Act (the "FCA") go into effect.
United States Employment and HR To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.Under the FCA, employers with at least four employees are prohibited from inquiring about a job applicant's criminal history until after a conditional offer of employment has been made to the applicant. In addition, employers are prohibited from referring to criminal history in job postings, employment applications, or any type of inquiry during the interview process itself. Prohibited inquiries extend to conducting investigations into an applicant's criminal history, such as using publicly available records or conducting searches on the Internet, regardless of whether the investigations are conducted by the employer or a third party. There are narrow exceptions, such as for employers who are required to conduct background screens pursuant to federal, state, or local law, or subject to the rules of a financial self-regulatory organization, such as the SEC or FINRA.
In the event that an employer decides to rescind the conditional offer of employment due to an applicant's criminal history, the FCA requires that covered the employer follow certain procedures. The factors outlined in Article 23-A of the New York Correction Law must be taken into consideration in order to reach a determination as to whether there is a "direct relationship" between the applicant's criminal conviction history and the job duties in question, or an unreasonable risk to people or property that would preclude the applicant from employment. The FCA also sets forth a fair chance process, including providing applicants with a copy of their background check report, an analysis of the factors outlined in Article 23-A (in a form prescribed by the Commission, or one that is reasonably similar) and an opportunity for the applicant to address the criminal history at issue and present mitigating information or material before the offer of employment is rescinded.
The Commission has identified per se violations, regardless of whether adverse action is actually taken by the employer:
Per se violations may result in employers incurring fines based upon the employer's size and history of previous violations; they range from $500 to $3,500 for initial violations to $1,000 to $10,000 for repeat violations. Willful, wanton, or malicious actions found on the part of an employer may result in the Commission's imposition of a civil penalty of up to $250,000. Additionally, violations of the FCA may result in compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney's fees.
The Rules emphasize that an employer can never require an applicant to disclose, nor may it consider, non-convictions (i.e., criminal accusations that are not currently pending, were terminated in favor of the applicant, were adjudicated as a juvenile or resulted in a sealed conviction). Inquiries or consideration of non-convictions would be deemed a per se violation.
The fair chance process is NOT applicable to pending criminal charges, however, employers still cannot make inquiry or explore information about such charges before a conditional offer of employment is made.
If an employer inadvertently learns of an applicant's criminal history without solicitation or inquiry, the employer will not be liable under the FCA. This does not allow the employer to inquire further about the criminal history or rely on the information for hiring purposes without a conditional offer of employment being made.
While temporary help agencies must comply with the FCA, the Rules recognize that conditional offers generally only make the applicant available for assignment to agency clients. The Rules clarify that temporary help agencies may consider only the minimum skill requirements and qualifications necessary in order to evaluate convictions to determine whether they are job-related. Temporary help agencies cannot make determinations about an applicant's suitability based upon an employer's preference to disqualify individuals with specific types of convictions.
The Rules expressly provide that, "[i]f a background check reveals that an applicant has intentionally failed to answer a legitimate question about their conviction history, the employer, employment agency, or agent thereof may revoke the conditional offer or take an adverse employment action." Rescission of the employment offer would still need to comply with the fair chance process under the FCA.
The Rules impose a rebuttable presumption that a rescission of a conditional offer of employment was motivated by a candidate's criminal history. In order to rebut the presumption, employers can show that the rescission was based upon a permissible physical examination or material information it could not have reasonably known before extending a conditional offer or evidence that the employer had no knowledge of the candidate's criminal history prior to revocation.
The Commission has implemented an early resolution program to allow employers to admit liability for per se violations of the FCA. The employer would have to accept a penalty and enter into an agreement with respect to compliance, however, the Commission reserves the discretion to conduct a full investigation and take a complaint to hearing if an early resolution would not serve the public interest.
Employers operating in New York City have been legally obligated to comply with the FCA since October 27, 2015, however, they should take this opportunity to review their applications, job postings, policies, practices, and onboarding documents to ensure that they are prepared to comply with the more robust guidance. Additionally, employers should ensure that all recruiting and onboarding personnel and human resource business representatives understand the FCA compliance requirements.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.